Pull claim status, retrieve denial detail, and file appeals through the payer portals where that work actually lives. The follow-up half of the revenue cycle, the part the EDI rails don’t carry, run as a browser agent instead of a queue of portal logins.
Go-live in as little as 30 minBrowser agentCustomer portal login
We map your process, volume, and exception paths, then recommend a practical first scope.
Building internally? Read the docs →
How Asteroid runs this workflow
A claim lands in the follow-up queue, Asteroid pulls its status and denial detail off the payer portal, assembles the appeal from the documentation your team provides, and files it. The argument for overturning a denial is never the agent's to make, so that judgment stops with your staff.
How it actually runs
The appeal argument itself stays human, deliberately: the agent retrieves, assembles, and files, but it never invents the clinical or contractual case for overturning a denial.
A claim or follow-up item enters the work queue
Updated record in your claim queue
The portal's status, the structured denial detail, the appeal confirmation, and the deadline position write back to your claim queue, claim by claim.
Appeal decision or ambiguous denial: The denial record and the portal's wording return to your team; a person decides whether to fight and supplies the argument, once, and the filing proceeds.
Denial follow-up is the queue that loses to everything else, because it’s the most manual work in the revenue cycle: portal by portal, claim by claim, screen by screen. But appeal windows and filing deadlines run on the payer’s calendar whether or not anyone opened the queue this week, and a denial that ages out stops being a denial and becomes a write-off. Running status sweeps and denial retrieval as agents means the queue is worked on schedule, and what reaches your staff is the decision-shaped part: which denials to fight and with what argument.
At scale
These claims agents are in the catalogue pipeline; the same portal discipline runs today one step upstream in the prior authorization submission workflows, reference numbers and statuses captured on every run. At queue scale, status sweeps run nightly across the payer mix and appeals file as fast as your team approves the argument; the queue layer above this loop is denial management, the economics are in the medical billing automation deep-dive, and if the denial queue is the current pain, scoping a build against your payer mix is the fastest path. Category view: the claims and denials workflow library.
Questions
Disclaimer
Third-party names, including government agencies and registries, are used only to identify systems commonly involved in healthcare operations workflows. Asteroid is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or certified by those third parties unless expressly stated. Workflow availability depends on customer authorization, account permissions, configuration, and applicable system terms.